Talk:Oscar Wilde

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Good articleOscar Wilde has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 15, 2004Peer reviewReviewed
January 17, 2006Good article nomineeListed
August 8, 2007WikiProject peer reviewReviewed
June 13, 2009Good article reassessmentDelisted
April 14, 2010Good article nomineeListed
August 16, 2010Peer reviewReviewed
Current status: Good article

Consensual revisited[edit]

A recent book revisits the evidence from the trial and suggests that Wilde pressurised boys.

Review of the book in the Independent

Ender's Shadow Snr (talk) 01:03, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Revised Ender's Shadow Snr (talk) 01:16, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Right, and word it how? The way it was inserted was a mess, especially for a GA. Word it in here (and properly sourced), with a consensus, and then add. Duffy BT (talk) 20:55, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Section hatnotes vs. in-text links[edit]

I boldly made this edit to replace three hatnote links to works discussed in a subsection with in-text wikilinks. But I notice this practice is used in several other places in the article, so I thought I'd bring it up here. Thoughts on whether to continue the status quo vs. replacing hatnotes with in-text links where possible? I'm in favour of the change, because it allows the reader to follow (or hover/preview) the link to work X at the point in their reading where it's first mentioned. It's also just a more compact use of space. But I can see an argument that the hatnote links make it a bit easier to see the overall organization at a glance. Colin M (talk) 19:24, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

Another option I didn't consider above would be to keep the hatnotes but also add in-text links at first mention. Also, I found a relevant discussion at the talk page for MOS:LINK, though it didn't reach any consensus. Colin M (talk) 19:08, 16 June 2021 (UTC)